Cheryl always gets quite the extreme reaction from you. When she commented on CB, you went into full on meltdown, when Nicole Scherz talks about how her and CB are friends, all that gets is a 'disapoint' and you reasoned out of caring about Britney being on the same track as him. Is it that you never really like CC or a case of you liked her so much,shes english,which makes her somehow more relatable and thus provokes these strong reactions. I've seen it in others too. Just curious. And bored.
Asked by Anonymous
This is a good question. I think part of it is that pretty much everyone I follow on Twitter is a Cheryl/Aloud fan so I end up being exposed to a lot more info on Cheryl than I am a lot of my other faves. Plus it happens in real time so I react in real time. It’s hard to retrospectively blow up over Scherzy being friends with Chris Brown before I was even a fan. And as for Britney being on the same track as him - I didn’t reason out of caring, I KNEW that it was being misreported and people had interpreted that old man’s tweet wrong. I didn’t need to blow up about it because I knew it wasn’t true.
I think, when you are a fan of someone, there’s a certain investment made - time, money, interest, emotion - and at some point you have to feel like that investment is making a return. That it’s worthwhile being a fan. I am disappointed by Cheryl easily as many times as I am enthralled by her so it’s like a weird, push/pull conflict of wanting to support her because I think she’s a fucking amazing popstar and not wanting to support her because I’m not sure I think she’s a fucking amazing person. Basically, being a Cheryl fan doesn’t exactly come with a massive pay off. *shrug*
